Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-03-22 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-03-22 House Journal Page 0865 HB 173 Representative Brown brought up reconsideration of the vote on HB 173 (page 819). The following was again before the House in third reading: HOUSE BILL NO. 173 "An Act relating to reports by state agencies." 1995-03-22 House Journal Page 0866 HB 173 The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HB 173 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 173--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: MacLean, Nicholia Absent: Sanders And so, HB 173 passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that the House adopt the following letter of intent offered by Representatives Brown, G.Davis and Davies: "It is the intent of the Legislature that state agencies, when notifying the Legislature that a report is available, should also provide a brief synopsis or executive summary of the report. It is further the intent of the Legislature that, if feasible, agencies provide this notification to all members via the legislative electronic network in addition to providing notice to the House Chief Clerk and Senate Secretary, and further that agencies make the contents of the report available in electronic format and accessible through electronic networks." Representative Martin objected. An amendment to the letter of intent was offered by Representative G.Davis: Line 3, after "report." Delete all material 1995-03-22 House Journal Page 0867 HB 173 Representative G.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to the letter of intent be adopted. Representative Brown objected. Representative G.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw the amendment to the letter of intent. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall the letter of intent to HB 173 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 173--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Letter of Intent YEAS: 34 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Williams, Willis Nays: Martin, Vezey Excused: MacLean, Nicholia Absent: Moses, Sanders And so, the letter of intent was adopted. HB 173 was engrossed, signed by the Speaker and Chief Clerk and transmitted to the Senate for consideration.